west_tiger (west_tiger) wrote in bloody_roar,
west_tiger
west_tiger
bloody_roar

  • Mood:
  • Music:

The Fur Debate - Freaky, pathetic, stupid or just...ugh?

I'm going to put an lj-cut here, I have no idea how long I'd ramble see @_@



Basically, I was just thinking of starting a wee discussion ^^ Go me!

Anyway, we all know that Bloody Roar characters are under the realistic anthro category, as opposed to the...'furry' category, which is basically cartoony people with animal heads that interest me in a creepy way much like Grissom in an episode of CSI.

So, what are your thoughts of the 'furries' and the 'realies'? Personally, I CAN'T stand furries. I mean, bad enough they are cute, but the fact they all look so humanoid is obviously reflecting the weird orientations of their human creators. Nothing says desperate as a furry in human clothes IMHO. Realistic ones just remind me of werewolfs, and half-way enlightened creatures in Chinese mythology and such, you know?

That's my two-cents, please send in your own nickels ^^ (oh GOD that was lame @_@)
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 11 comments